Possibly inspired by this blog (it’s always good to dream
big), it seems that some of the world’s most preeminent climate scientists have
been doing some fact checking of their own. This week, a paper was released in Science Advances adding support to the argument that there has not actually
been a ‘hiatus’ in warming at all.
You may have seen this reported in the news.
It has received quite a lot of attention as it refutes one of the most popular
arguments of climate change ‘sceptics’ (see my first mythbusting post).
The paper corroborates an earlier study by the NOAA
that the apparent slow down in warming is in fact an artefact of the way measurements are
made. Changes in the way sea surface temperature measurements are taken, for
example a move towards using buoys rather than ships, have resulted in measurement
biases. This distorted the true trend in temperature changes.
Figure 1: From the BBC website,
showing the NOAAs new dataset (red), which corrected the biases from older, less
accurate instruments (blue).
This week’s paper presented a climate dataset which fully corrected
for the different methods of collecting temperature observations. Both this and
the NOAA data found rates of warming over the past decade to be comparable to
earlier rates, in contrast to previous reports of a ‘hiatus’ which even made it
into the 5th IPCC report.
This paper highlights the importance of critically
evaluating science. However, it also reinforces the message from the extreme
weather report is discussed in my earlier blog about the difficulty of communicating science. People with more experience science understand the concepts of instrumental bias, error, and
uncertainty. However, to most people these words suggest something entirely
different.
In some ways it is understandable why so many people are suspicious
of claims about climate change when climate scientists themselves can’t seem to
decide what’s going on. The scientific community as a whole needs to work on
making science communication more accessible. In climate science especially this
is of the upmost importance. I think a good start would to spend more time focussing
on what we know, and less on what we don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment